The Well-Timed Strategy
Economic & Stock Market Analysis for the Discerning Investor
& Executive
www.peternavarro.com
Read it and Reap!
Week Ending Feb 29, 2008
Volume 9, Number 4
Announcements: Click here for my oped
with Greg Autry on the Pentagon’s satellite shootdown…
This Week: Grading the Macrotrading Challenge
Last week, I issued a
challenge to test your macrotrading mettle. I asked you to indicate whether you
would go long, short, or neutral over a broad range of assets in three different scenarios:
Scenario
One: The United States goes into a recession. This
drags Europe into recession and slows Asia down significantly. Inflationary pressures abate. This is the “US as locomotive” scenario.
Scenario
Two:
The United States economy goes into her recession, inflationary
pressures abate in the US, but the recession
does not spread to the rest of the world. European growth is reasonably strong
with mid to high inflation while Asia continues strong growth with inflationary pressures. This is the so-called “decoupling” scenario.
Scenario
Three: Both the US and European economies are characterized by recession and inflation – stagflation. Asia slows down while experiencing inflation as well. This is the “stagflation” scenario.
I want to emphasis just how useful such an exercise can
be in the current climate of uncertainty when “buy and hold” in U.S.
stocks is a dead 20th century artifact.
The matrix below offers my view as to where the best direction
of the trade lies. Note that I do not allow for any secular trends in
the trade, only short run cyclical movements in the asset classes.
I had many good responses to the challenge. Much of the disagreement many respondents have with the chart below is the result not of bad macro thinking
but rather of bringing secular trends into the calculus. For example, energy
is a clear short in the U.S. as Locomotive
Scenario based on falling energy demand. However, a secularist might argue that
the market is supply-constrained and will continue to move up in a secular trend. I
don’t discount that rationale. However, it is not part of the assumptions underlying
the challenge.
Below the chart are my explanations for the boxes. Clearly, the hardest part of the matrix is the currency pairs, as I shall explain
below:
|
|
U.S. as Locomotive Scenario |
Decoupling Scenario |
Stagflation Scenario |
|
Commodities |
|
|
|
|
Gold |
S |
L |
L |
|
Energy |
S |
L |
S |
|
Metals |
S |
L |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
BOND MARKET |
|
|
|
|
U.S. Long Bond |
L |
N |
S |
|
Currency |
|
|
|
|
Dollar/Yuan |
S |
S |
N |
|
Dollar/Euro |
N |
S |
N |
|
Euro/Yuan |
S |
N |
N |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity Index Funds |
|
|
|
|
U.S. S&P 500 |
S |
S |
S |
|
Europe |
S |
L |
S |
|
Asia |
S |
L |
S |
|
U.S. Growth |
S |
S |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Residential Real Estate |
S |
N |
S |
L= Long, S
= Short, N= Neutral (No more
than 3 N’s)
The Commodities
I view gold as primarily an inflation hedge. While energy and industrial
metals have some inflation hedge component, that component is assumed to be dominated by the cyclical nature of energy and
metals demand.
Under these assumptions, in Scenario I, gold is a short as inflation moderates and energy and metals are shorts
as cyclical demand moderates.
In Scenario II, robust global demand and inflation make gold, energy, and metals all longs.
In Scenario III, inflation makes gold a long while recession makes energy and metals shorts.
The Bond Market
The critical relationship here is the inverse relation between bond prices and interest rates while nominal interest
rates rise with inflation.
While the Fed and ECB set short term interest rates, the market sets long bond rates based on expectations of inflation. Falling inflationary expectations in the presence of recession lead bond investors
to go long the long bond to lock in higher yields. As inflation falls, interest
rates fall and bond prices rise, rewarding bond investors.
In Scenario I with recession and low inflation, going long the long bond is clearly the winner while in Scenario
III, inflation makes the long bond a good short.
Scenario II is the most difficult. Recession and low inflation in
the U.S. suggest going long. However, as interest rates rise in Europe and Asia, bond investors may move out of U.S. bonds, causing bond prices to fall.
The Currency Markets
Scenario II is the most clear cut. With the U.S. falling into recession and cutting
interest rates and both Europe and Asia growing, interest rate differentials between the U.S.
and Europe and the U.S. and Asia will
put strong downward pressure on the dollar. Thus, both the Dollar/Yuan and Dollar/Euro
pairs are shorts. As for the Euro/Yuan pair, this has to be an N. We just don’t have enough information about relative interest rates and relative growth rates. Nor do we know how committed the Chinese will stay to the Dollar/Yuan peg.
As for Scenario I, this one is very sticky. The Dollar/Euro is clearly
an N as both the U.S. and Europe are in
recession and rate-cutting modes. However, it is unclear which entity will cut
more aggressively.
One can offer at least a weak argument to short both the Dollar/Yuan and Euro/Yuan pairs on the assumption that
both the Fed and ECB will be more aggressive at cutting interest rates than China.
This could easily be an N as well, however.
Scenario III seems to be a total spin of the macro wheel. You could
argue longs on the Dollar/Yuan and Dollar/Euro pairs on the U.S. as safe
haven argument but shorts on the “Asia grows faster” argument.
The Equity Markets
I assume that equity prices reflect profit expectations and that current growth projections are built into stock
prices at the beginning of the period BEFORE the scenarios unfold.
In Scenario I, both U.S. and European equities are clear shorts
as are U.S. growth stocks. More subtly, Asia is a short as well because a slowdown is sufficient
to trigger a cyclical bear movement.
Scenario II features shorts for both U.S. S&P and growth stocks on declining profits while Europe and Asia are clear longs.<